By my informal count, I visited 28 churches during my seven
weeks in the United Kingdom. This
included 17 cathedrals, 8 parish churches, and 3 chapels. I am, after all, a real “church geek,” as
well as a big fan of architecture.
There were, of course, many similarities between the
churches, especially the medieval cathedrals.
But there was quite a bit of diversity as well, not only in their design
but also in their purpose. Some were meant
to be displays of power. Kings and
prince bishops wanted to show their subjects who was in charge. Others were built to be bigger and better
than someone else’s. Salisbury Cathedral’s
steeple is the tallest in England—so tall, in fact, that the stone pillars that
supported it began to bend! The building
had to be reinforced in order to support the weight. Still others were built to be “tourist
attractions.” They were pilgrimage
sites, attracting thousands of people each year to view and venerate some saint’s
relics (and leave behind a few coins for the upkeep of the church and its religious
community).
But the most compelling purpose came to light when we
learned that most of the cathedrals began their lives as monastery
chapels. They weren’t built large
because large congregations worshiped in them.
Their congregation of monks never
numbered more than a few dozen. They
weren’t built for any such practical purpose.
They were built large in order to provide a visible reminder of the
grandeur and glory of God.
Few people think that way anymore. We think functionally, practically. What good is an extravagantly built, overly
large building? It only makes it cost
more. But that wasn’t the attitude of
the medieval builders and craftspeople.
They invested their resources to produce a building that would instill a
sense of awe and wonder, that would itself be an act of worship.
Each building had its own appeal. For sheer impact, none of them could top
Durham Cathedral. Its setting—on top of
a hill, inside a bend in the River Wear—is most impressive. You approach across a large grassy courtyard,
allowing you to see its full size. Inside,
the massive decorated piers that support the roof draw your eyes upward. The long, open nave draws your eyes down the
length of the church to the high altar and the rose window beyond. The view of the tower at the crossing was
likewise impressive.
But the one feature at Durham that most impressed me, unique
among all the churches we visited, was the lectern. All the other cathedrals we visited had eagle
lecterns. The Bible or other books would
be laid upon the eagle’s outstretched wings.
There is certainly religious precedent for using eagles (“But those who
wait for the Lord shall renew their strength.
They shall mount up with wings like eagles.” (Isaiah 40:31).
But eagles are also symbols of power—royal power,
ecclesiastical power, even military power—something evident in the many
military chapels and monuments in the cathedrals.
But at Durham, the lectern depicted something else
altogether. There, the Bible would be
laid upon the outstretched wings of a pelican, shown pecking her breast in
order to feed her young with her own blood.
It’s a symbol of self-giving love, of Jesus Christ, of the life he made
possible by giving up his own. Not a
symbol of power, but of self-giving love.
It shall be something I always hold dear.
While we certainly walked on holy ground while visiting
cathedrals, we discovered holy ground in some unexpected places. More on that in Part Two.
No comments:
Post a Comment